|Posted by LEE JUNE MO on July 11, 2015 at 7:10 AM|
The pen is mightier than the sword.
At this topic, the pen means nonviolence and the sword means the violence.
Today, America and western Europe countries who have big army rule the world. We can know the sword is very important thing by this example. If they don't have any sword thing, they can't rule the world. Korea and many other weak country can't rule the world because they don't have big army. We have good pen but America and Western Europe's sword power is stronger than our pen. So, we can't rule the world. By that example, the logic 'that someone who has sword rule the world.' is establish. And, that logic apply on the world for hundred thousands of years. So I think the sword is mightier than the pen.
First, the sword can solve the mater faster than the pen. The sword can make people to obey the order at once. As you know, Heig envoy didn't make Korea become independent because they just use the pen. So it made us to wait for 35 years. But, if we use the sword, we can achieve goal very fast. America became independent from England very fast. American started to want independence at 1773. They became independent at 1776 by the sword. Like this sword can solve the mater faster than the pen.
Second the sword can resolve the matter completely. They don't leave any future trouble. The sword can kill or lock up the protestors. So it can eliminate revenge. And by the fear, it can prevent potential danger. The sword can stamp to protestor’s mind that not to against the country. But, the pen can't. The fear in regard to the sword can apply on every people. But, the pen's nonviolence ways can't apply on every people. As you know it's useless telling DPRK is not heaven in the DPRK. Because they have fear in regard to the sword.
By these things, I think the sword is mightier than the pen.